More information
Description
Freedom of assembly is one of fundamental human rights, therefore, any violation thereof is a disturbing signal. Over the past years, it has become a common practice to use public gatherings as a method of exercising pressure on authorities by social movements - when it comes to women''s rights, LGBTQIA community, or independent judiciary. That is why it is even more important for organizations of groups discriminated against to have access to such a tool and not to be excluded from taking advantage of their rights anymore. However bans on gatherings disproportionately frequently affect groups discriminated against. For instance, since 2018, we have observed over a dozen bans on organizing Equality Marches in Poland. Being aware of the above, we decided that the existing analysis of freedom of assembly in Poland is incomplete and requires analyzing. The objective of the project is to diagnose the execution of the right to organize gatherings, particularly gatherings covering legal and human matters. Researching and monitoring will allow us to diagnose the situation related to violations of freedom of assembly more completely as well as create standards which local NGO may advocate. Monitoring will focus on 3 entities - organizers of gatherings, local governments, and the police. We will check practices and attitudes related to freedom of assembly in at least 6 cities. We will confront them with the experience of organizers of demonstrations related to human rights. Along with the network of organizers and partners, we will develop and present the results and will be conducting activities in order to guarantee freedom of assembly and increase the awareness of the rights of organizers of public gatherings. Cooperation with partners: Hinsegin dagar (Iceland) and Oslo Pride AS (Norway) - experts in supporting groups of excluded persons - will help us develop recommendations in order to guarantee the right to organize demonstrations in Poland.
Summary of project results
Freedom of assembly is one of the fundamental human rights, so any violation of it is a disturbing sign. Police and local government often take advantage of positions of force and the ignorance of organizers. It is common to prevent spontaneous assemblies, exercise discretion in registering cyclic assemblies or ban the use of public address systems. As experience has shown us, assembly bans disproportionately hit discriminated groups - more than a dozen Equality Marches in Poland have been banned since 2018. It was felt that the analysis of freedom of assembly in Poland so far is incomplete and needs to be deepened to include the situation outside Warsaw and the unequal treatment of assemblies.
The monitoring focused on three actors - assembly organizers, local governments and the police. We examined the practices and attitudes of the police and local governments toward freedom of assembly, and then contrasted them with the experiences of organizers of human rights demonstrations. We analyzed hundreds of institutional websites, Public Information Bulletins, as well as responses to requests for access to public information (local government and police) and media reports on assemblies over the past few years. All this allowed us to identify the biggest challenges and problems for the realization of this civil liberty.
Above all, however, we researched experiences and needs, including good and bad practices - together with a network of assembly organizers and foreign partners. A comprehensive report was produced, describing the aforementioned experiences, which also included strengthening advocacy on the subject with recommendations and standards for guarantees of freedom of assembly. The launch of the report was accompanied by a congress on freedom of assembly, which brought together more than a hundred people.
Over the course of the project, we observed dozens of gatherings and spoke with hundreds of people, both involved in organizing protests and participating in them. We asked about their experiences, opinions, but also their needs. About whether they feel safe and what they need for the right to freedom of assembly to be realized.
The project was successful. Thanks to the data collected, effective advocacy was conducted. Two members of the project team were invited to the council to the Ministry of Internal Affairs on new standards for services, with a particular focus on freedom of assembly and accountability for its violations. In addition, more than a hundred organizations deepened their knowledge of the right to demonstrate.
.
.
Summary of bilateral results
We had 2 partners:- from Iceland a non-governmental organization- from Norway a company founded by NGOs. We evaluated it well, because through our partners we reached the decision makers of the marches/pride from Norway and Iceland.We knew these organizations from previous cooperation.There was some misunderstanding of the Norwegian organization, which is due to cultural differences (in Norway, pride is grounded in law under freedom of expression, and in Poland it is the right to assembly in the sense of civil law).We sensitized them to the danger of limiting the rights of LGBT+ people, which can happen in any country. We advised them to increase their vigilance against the election campaigns of populist politicians, which are created on the basis of the vilification of LGBT+ people. This phenomenon has begun to emerge in Iceland and Norway.Thanks to our Norwegian partner, we got to know another organization: Amnesty Norge, with which we started working together.